Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 2011No. 080431569; A140377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, after a jury verdict, of third- degree assault for intentionally causing injury to a person “[w]hile being aided by another person actually present.” ORS 163.165(l)(e). He argues, first, that the court erred by instructing the jurors that they could convict him of third-degree assault for aiding or abetting a co-assailant who hit the victim. He also argues that, under State v. Boots, 308 Or 371, 780 P2d 725 (1989), cert den, 510 US 1013 (1993), the trial court erred in rejecting his request to instruct the jury that, because there were two ways…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. PineOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API