Metzler v. James
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Superior Court of Denver. Action by Philip W. James against Hannah Metzler for an account and redemption under a mortgage of merchandise. Edward H. Cadwell, one of the mortgagors, refused to join as plaintiff, and was made defendant. Decree for plaintiff, and Mrs. Metzler appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
De France, C.
This is, in its essential features, an action for an accounting and redemption under a chattel mortgage. The appellee, Philip W. James, and'one Edward H. Cadwell, as equal copartners under the firm name of Cadwell & James, were engaged in and carrying on the drug business at two different establishments in the city of Denver; - and on the 9th day of January, 1884, borrowed of the appellant, Hannah Metzler, the sum of $2,700, which they engaged to pay back in one year, in twelve equal monthly instalments, with interest at three per cent, per month, with the privilege of paying the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stoddard v. DenisonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
- Blodgett v. BlodgettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
- Boyd v. BeaudinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burchinell v. KoonColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
- First National Bank v. WilburSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Bragdon v. BradtColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
- McCormick v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Ellis v. GibbonsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.