Legal Opinion

United States v. DeSalvo

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1992No. CR-92-119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SIFTON, District Judge.

This decision considers defendant’s omnibus pretrial motion requesting various forms of relief including dismissal of the superseding indictment. The motion is denied for the reasons hereinafter set forth.

The indictment charges defendant with twelve counts of perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a), and obstructing justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503.

This case is related to the prosecution of seven persons associated with the law firm Morris P. Eisen, P.C. (“Eisen firm”) for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. United States v. Frank DesalvoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API