Legal Opinion
United States v. Echols
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 9, 1976No. Crim. A. No. 75-359PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PALMIERI, District Judge.*
This is a simple matter involving an alleged evasion of F.R.Crim.P. 6(d) by the government in their prosecution of the defendants for the alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1462 and 2.
F.R.Crim.P. 6(d) provides:
“Attorneys for the government, the witness under examination, interpreters when needed and, for the purpose of taking the evidence, a stenographer or operator of a recording device may be present while the grand jury is in session, but no person other than the jurors may be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting.” (Emphasis ours)
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
- United States v. GoldmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
- United States v. IsaacsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- United States v. CarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- United States v. BowdachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. George Perkins EcholsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- People v. 80 Main Street Theatre Corp., New York County Courts1976
- Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negot. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024