Acri v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CATTANI, Judge:
¶ 1 Residents of Yarnell and surrounding areas (the “Residents”) appeal from the superior court’s ruling dismissing their negligence claims against the State of Arizona and the Arizona State Forestry Division (collectively, “State”) arising from damage caused by the Yarnell Hill Fire. Because the superi- or court correctly concluded that the State did not owe a duty to protect the Residents’ property against naturally caused wildfires, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
112 On the afternoon of June 30, 2013, the Yarnell Hill Fire burned out of control, killing 19…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Stanley v. McCarverArizona Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schiager v. Landmark LandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Stair v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018