Legal Opinion

Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1922No. 12343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on contract; from Chatham superior court — Judge Meldrim. December 27, 1920. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial complain that the court erred “ in failing to construe and in*83terpret for the jury and to instruct the jury as to the construction and interpretation of the contracts for the alleged breach of which the plaintiff sued.” These grounds of the motion are without merit. As far as the character of the contracts required, the judge didj construe them, and if more specific instructions were desired, a proper and timely written request therefor should have been made. Even had the court not construed any portion of these contracts, the plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Lindsay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Jones v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Thompson v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Weldon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Hutcheson v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Costley v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API