Legal Opinion

Thompson v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1902PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Action on forthcoming bond. Before Judge Eve. City court of Richmond county. July 5, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

O’Connor, sheriff of Richmond county, and Pritchard, deputy-sheriff, brought suit against Thompson & Son as principals, and' Heggie Brothers as securities, on a forthcoming bond given in a claim case wherein Thompson & Son were'claimants. The bond sued on was made payable to “E. E. Pritchard, deputy-sheriff of said [Richmond] county.” The defendants demurred generally, and further upon the grounds that the complaint failed to show legal capacity in the plaintiffs, or either of them, to maintain the suit, and did not allege the value of the property which it was charged the defendants failed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grace v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Campbell v. BushSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Conley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Shippey Bros. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Fievet v. CurlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API