Tarman v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court adjudging defendant in error to be entitled to oil royalties accrued and to accrue from lands set apart to her as a homestead.
Absalom E. Pierce, deceased, was married twice. Indiana H. Pierce, defendant in error, was his second wife. Mabel Louise Tarman, Zoa Matie Earis, Goldie Bohm, John C. Pierce, and Edith M. Randles are his children by his first wife. Lawrence Dalton and Harold Dalton are his grandchildren, being children of a deceased daughter.
After the death of his first wife, and while a widower, he being the owner of the S.W.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawley v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In re Estate of GroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Estate of FirthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hembree v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lusk v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Youngman v. ShularCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Baze v. ScottDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1938
- Kemp v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946