Legal Opinion

DeVries v. Spring Valley Township Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1926No. 25,419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action on an insurance policy. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

On July 23, 1924, the plaintiff sustained a fire loss of $405 on his farm property. He had an effective policy in the defendant company unless forfeited by nonpayment of an assessment due June 5, 1924; and the fact of forfeiture depends upon whether a notice of assessment had been mailed him by the company 30 days prior thereto. It is conceded, if we understand counsel, that under the by-laws the mailing of the notice was the one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kingsland Land Co. v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Jackson v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Duffy v. Insurance Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Kingsland Land Co. v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Clark v. Rochester Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Department of Employment Security v. Minnesota Drug Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Blixt v. Civil Service Bd., State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API