Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Hancharik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1989No. 121Published

1ConcurrenceTamilia, Judge

I agree with the majority that the testimonial privilege announced by the legislature at 42 Pa.C.S. § 5914, providing that a spouse is not competent to testify against his/her wife or husband, is qualified by section 5913 which abolishes the privileges in family matters including situations involving violence or attempted violence against a spouse or children in the care or custody of either of them. To hold otherwise would be to shift the intent of section 5913 and to create an in-road in that section, which was never intended by the legislature.

The thrust of section 5913 must be measured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Hack v. HackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  5. Merritt v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API