State v. Howard
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant Roy Eugene Howard was tried and convicted on three counts of violation of A.R.S. § 13-652, lewd and lascivious acts. From the judgment and sentence thereon, he appeals.
The evidence for the State tended to show that on the dates specified in the information, appellant and a young girl, age *34112, herein called the complaining witness, committed certain acts of fellatio and cunnilingus. It is appellant’s position that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty in that the complaining witness was an accomplice and as such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- State v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.