Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1965No. 1332PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant Roy Eugene Howard was tried and convicted on three counts of violation of A.R.S. § 13-652, lewd and lascivious acts. From the judgment and sentence thereon, he appeals.

The evidence for the State tended to show that on the dates specified in the information, appellant and a young girl, age *34112, herein called the complaining witness, committed certain acts of fellatio and cunnilingus. It is appellant’s position that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict of not guilty in that the complaining witness was an accomplice and as such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. State v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API