Edington v. New Mexico Public Service Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
The district court affirmed an order of the New Mexico Public Service Commission, which concerned the supplying of electrical service in the area of Rodeo, New Mexico. This appeal challenges the authority of the Commission to declare Columbus Electric Cooperative, Inc. a public utility and grant it a certificate of public convenience and necessity.
For simplicity, appellant will be referred to as “Edington,” The New Mexico Public Service Commission as “the Commission,” and Columbus Electric Cooperative, Inc. as "Columbus,” both of the latter being appellees.
Edington owns and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Grosso v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Tooz v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Socorro Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Hickok's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Community Public Service Co. v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Property Tax Department v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Lea County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. N.M. Pub. Regulation Com'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.