Legal Opinion

M. O'Connor Contracting, Inc. v. City of Brockton

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 7, 2004No. 02-P-1017PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.

At issue in this appeal is whether the city of Brock-ton must pay an award of double damages under G. L. c. 93A in a construction contract case that was decided, over the city’s objection, by an arbitrator. Although we reject the city’s contention that the arbitration agreement cannot be read to authorize arbitration of a c. 93A claim, we nevertheless conclude that the award must be vacated as beyond the arbitrator’s authority because it is contrary to principles of sovereign immunity and, hence, against public policy.

*279Background. Undertaking to build a new municipal building to house its…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lantner v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Spence v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Beverly v. Bass River Golf Mgmt., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Sheriff of Suffolk County v. Jail Officers & Employees of Suffolk CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Massachusetts Highway Department v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung der Wissen-Schaften E.V. v. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical ResearchDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Brown v. Office of the Commissioner of ProbationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API