Arnold v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where plaintiffs' claims fail to demonstrate a particularized actual injury and are not based on a legally protected interest as required by North Carolina law, plaintiffs cannot establish standing, and the trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion to dismiss.
Plaintiffs James Arnold and Leah Metcalf attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ("defendant" or "UNC") on athletic scholarships and graduated in 2006 and 2009, respectively. They assert their education was faulty as a result of defendant enrolling student athletes into "hundreds of sham…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Beachcomber Properties, L.L.C v. Station One, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Ryan v. University of North Carolina HospitalsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McClean v. Duke Univ.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Herrera v. Charlotte School of Law, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018