Legal Opinion

Harbuck v. Richland Box Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1948No. 16231PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The amended motion for new trial assigns error on the admission in evidence over timely objections of the resolution or ordinance of the City of Richland abandoning 20 feet of Alston Street to the use of the defendant, and to certain charges of the court with reference to the legal effect of the ordinance. Error is also assigned on the failure of the court to give certain written requests to charge with reference to the ordinance.

It is clear from the demurrer interposed to the defendant’s answer and from the grounds of the amended motion for new trial that the controlling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marietta Chair Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Barham v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Simon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  4. City Council v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Robins v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. City of Moultrie v. Colquitt County Rural Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Gates v. City Council of BloomfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Harbuck v. Richland Box CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Charles v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API