Legal Opinion

Harbuck v. Richland Box Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1951No. 17308PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

When this case was here before, this court held that the ordinance of the City of Richland, then relied upon by the defendant, was ultra vires and void, in that it sought to authorize and ratify the maintenance by the defendant of a permanent obstruction in a public street amounting to a public nuisance. Harbuck v. Richland Box Co., 204 Ga. 352 (49 S. E. 2d, 883). Since the rendition of that decision, the City of Richland has adopted another ordinance providing: “1. That all that part of Alston Street lying west of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company’s track (the railroad…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marietta Chair Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Wood v. ShoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Harbuck v. Richland Box Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Wright v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calvary Independent Baptist Church v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Jackson v. Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Dunlap v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Harper v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Calvary Independent Baptist Church v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API