Wolfs v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the crime of assault with intent to kill. His punishment was assessed at 19 years in the penitentiary and from a judgment on that verdict comes this appeal. Appellant first contends for reversal that the court erred in its failure to grant appellant’s motion for a continuance. We cannot agree.
Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1705 (Repl. 1964) provides that defendant must show “sufficient cause” to' secure a continuance. Appellant acknowledges that in interpreting this statute the rule is well established in our state that a motion for continuance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Therman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Scates v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Ebsen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jay Randall Wolfs v. R. G. Britton, Superintendent, Tucker Unit, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Swaim v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996