Legal Opinion

Wolfs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 17, 1973No. CR 73-72PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the crime of assault with intent to kill. His punishment was assessed at 19 years in the penitentiary and from a judgment on that verdict comes this appeal. Appellant first contends for reversal that the court erred in its failure to grant appellant’s motion for a continuance. We cannot agree.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1705 (Repl. 1964) provides that defendant must show “sufficient cause” to' secure a continuance. Appellant acknowledges that in interpreting this statute the rule is well established in our state that a motion for continuance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Therman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Scates v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Ebsen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jay Randall Wolfs v. R. G. Britton, Superintendent, Tucker Unit, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Swaim v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API