Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1996No. CR 95-30Published

1Opinion of the Court

918 S.W.2d 690 (1996)

323 Ark. 743

Samuel Willie OLIVER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

No. CR 95-30.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 18, 1996.

Robert F. Morehead, Pine Bluff, for Appellant.

David R. Raupp, Asst. Attorney General, Little Rock, for Appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant Samuel Willie Oliver raises two points in his appeal of four convictions for delivery of crack cocaine. He first contends that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel and did not waive such. He, secondly, urges that his due process rights were violated owing to lack of information about the arresting…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API