Gray Const. Co. v. Hyde
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.
This case is before the court upon a rehearing heretofore granted. The former opinion of the court is reported in 49 S. D. 543, 207 N. W. at page 536. Oral arguments were made by counsel, and exhaustive briefs have been filed. The briefs, as well as the many cases cited therein, have been examined and given careful consideration. It is pointed out by counsel that we were mistaken in our opinion, in assuming that, appellants were directors of the defunct corporation. It is true that some of the appellants were not directors and never took any part in the activities of the corporations, but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Feehan v. KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Sprague v. National Bank of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Steam Stone Cutter Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Meyer v. Ruby Trust Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray Construction Co. v. FantleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Gray Construction Co. v. HydeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932