Legal Opinion

Gill Equipment Co. v. Kaufman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1952No. 13745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Alleging that he had bought, and paid fifty-four thousand dollars for, a Model 54-B Bucyrus — Erie Shovel, complete with Shovel Front attachment, but that defendant did not have clear title to, and had not, as it had agreed to do, delivered the shovel front to him or put him in possession, of it, plaintiff brought this suit to recover $10,-598.12, the value thereof.

The defendant, admitting the purchase as alleged, denied plaintiff’s charges that it had failed to make delivery or place plaintiff in possession of the shovel front as agreed. Alleging that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Petition of ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Davis v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fox v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. City of Wheeling v. Benwood-McMechen Water Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Walker-Smith Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heberling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API