Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 24, 2009No. Criminal No. 1989-0160Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § v. § Crim. Action No. 89-160-1 (RCL) § MARCOS ANDERSON, § F l L E D D f d t. ° °“ “” § JuL 2 4 2009 NANCYMAYER wmmncron, ctem< MEMORANDUM AND oRDER v.S. !JFSTR\CTC@L»RT Before this Court is Defendant Marcos Anderson’s Motion to Reconsider [14] then Chief Judge Thomas Hogan’s March l6, 2006 ruling [l3] denying Mr. Anderson’s two motions to supplement his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

petition in light of Um'ted States v. Booker,

543 U.S. 220

(2005), and Blakely v. Washington,

542 U.S. 296

(2004). For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API