Inhabitants of Winslow v. Inhabitants of Troy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Motion and exceptions by plaintiff. Overruled. Action for pauper supplies brought in the Superior Court for Kennebec County. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.
Action to recover for pauper supplies furnished to one Berneta Pomeroy, avIio is alleged to have a pauper settlement in the defendant toAvn. The verdict Avas for the defendant. The case conies up on the plaintiff’s exceptions and motion for a neAV trial. Several questions are presented, but it Avill be necessary to consider only one. ' For if the pauper’s settlement Avas not in the defendant town, it is unimportant here where it Avas. Assuming that the pauper’s derivative settlement was in the defendant town, the defendant contends that that settlement was lost by her residence for five years…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Town of Reading v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Martin v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Rankin v. PeisenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Sibley v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.