Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2007No. 66 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

We granted allowance of appeal to determine whether a state police laboratory report falls under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, see Pa.R.E. 803(6), so as to be admissible when the person who made the report is unavailable for cross-examination at trial.

Appellee was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (PWID). He filed a motion to suppress the evidence, which the trial court denied. At appellee’s bench trial, the court admitted into evidence, over appellee’s objection, the police crime laboratory report which…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. Barton-MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Magruder v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API