Picnics, Inc. v. Holland
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
IRENE C. BERGER, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 11), memorandum in support (Document 12), and enclosed exhibits. Upon careful consideration of the motion, the memoranda in support and in opposition, *584the reply, and the entire record, the Court finds, for the reasons stated herein, that Defendant’s motion should be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Picnics, Inc., doing business as Old Spruce Realty (“Picnics”), is a licensed real estate brokerage that was hired by Defendant, J. Craig Holland (“Holland”), to find…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- World-Wide Rights Limited Partnership v. Combe Incorporated Combe Puerto Rico, Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The London and Edinburgh Insurance Company, Limited, and the Dominion Insurance Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lifestyle Realty, LLC v. KirnDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024