Clark v. State

Branch, Judge.

On appeal from his conviction after a bench trial for driving under the influence (DUI), Justin Clark argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the results of a blood test administered after Clark was pulled over during a roadblock that he claims was illegal. Clark also asserts that the evidence establishing venue in Polk County was insufficient. We find no error and affirm.

“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.”…