State v. Conner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Jason Conner was stopped at a police roadblock and arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. Conner thereafter moved to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop, arguing that the roadblock was unlawful. The trial court granted Conner’s motion, finding that the roadblock was indeed unlawful because it was not “well-identified as a police checkpoint.” The State now appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the trial court erred in ruling that the roadblock was not well identified. For the reasons set forth infra, we agree and reverse.
Viewed in the light most…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- LaFontaine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Armentrout v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- THOMPSON v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- The State v. OsterlohCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- McCOY v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.