Stanley v. Amos
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The petition for certiorari showed a lack of diligence on the part of the plaintiff (defendant in the trial court) and her counsel. The case in the trial court had been started on Monday morning, when a jury had been stricken, and was adjourned until the following Wednesday morning. On Wednesday morning when it appeared that another case was on trial, the parties and counsel in this case were ordered back at 3 p. m. on Thursday. The trial judge stated on Wednesday morning that the defendant and her counsel “would be required to make a strict legal presentation of proof under oath for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- O'Barr v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Sutton v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cavender v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Interest of M. G. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Southern Railway Co. v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Americani v. SidkyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Beazley v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.