Legal Opinion

Rolland v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2627 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Forrest A. Holland, Jr., (claimant) appeals here from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision finding him to be a self-employed businessman and therefore ineligible for benefits pursuant to Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess,. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(h). We will affirm.

The claimant was president and a member of the board of directors of General Dealers Services, Inc. (corporation) and received a salary of $480 per week. He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Starinieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Newman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geever v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. George v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Pisano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. University City Housing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Dunkelberger v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API