First National Bank & Trust Co. Racine v. Plous Bros.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The plaintiff contends that the court erred in denying its motion for a deficiency judgment in the sum of $2,882.34. Under the terms of the mortgage, the plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment, in case the proceeds of sale on foreclosure were insufficient. The complaint prayed for such a judgment and the judgment entered so provided, but the court, upon motion to confirm, limited the amount thereof, apparently upon the ground that $18,500 represented the amount which it was satisfied the plaintiff should credit on the mortgage debt as the “fair value” of the premises, sec. 278.105…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Kremer v. RuleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Weimer v. UthusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Big Bay Realty Co. v. RosenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Wahl v. H. W. & S. M. Tullgren, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Tacoma v. McCaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1986