Legal Opinion

State v. Knapstad

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 1985No. 15123-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

Douglas W. Knapstad was charged by information with possession of a controlled substance with intent to manufacture and deliver. The State sought to prove the crime by establishing constructive possession by Knapstad of the premises where the marijuana was seized. The seizure was the result of execution of a valid search warrant. An informant had supplied information which formed the basis for probable cause for the search warrant. The State decided not to call this informant as a witness and decided not to disclose the name and address of the informant to the defense.

Upon motion by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Staats v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BrumageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API