Legal Opinion
People v. Cooley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal from her conviction of two counts of felony driving while intoxicated and a traffic violation is that County Court was required, but failed, to give the jury a circumstantial evidence instruction. This issue is not preserved for our review, however, because the defense neither requested such a charge nor objected to its omission from the jury instructions (see People v Ryan, 46 AD3d 1125, 1127-1128 [2007], Iv denied 10 NY3d 939 [2008]; People v Stanton, 21 AD3d 576, 577 [2005]; People v Wallace, 8 AD3d 753, 756 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 682 [2004]; see…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. CasperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. StrussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RodneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- PeoplevCokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014