Legal Opinion
Bratnober v. Rowell, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1963No. 38,751PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an action to recover from defendant, Rowell, Inc., (hereafter called Rowell) the sum of $18,500 paid by plaintiffs Bratnober to third parties in settlement of various claims against Independent Silo Company (hereafter called Silo), a concern purchased by Rowell from the Bratnobers.
The trial court made findings in favor of Rowell, and Bratnobers appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial or amended findings.
The Bratnobers were for many years the principal owners of Silo, which for a long time was managed by Ford Rowell and by his father before him. Silo…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Evans v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Boerger v. American General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Larson v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sargent v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Paul F. Sargent v. Roger T. Johnson, Architect, Axel H. Ohman, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, and Third-Party v. Preston Haglin Co., a Minnesota Corporation, Third-Party and Fourth-Party Paul F. Sargent, Intervenor v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977