Legal Opinion
Grissom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 12, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04049Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION SUSIE GRISSOM and LAKESHIA LOWE PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:22-cv-04049 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 10. Plaintiffs Susie Grissom and Lakeshia Lowe have responded. ECF No. 16. Defendant has replied to Plaintiffs’ response. ECF No. 25. Thus, the Court finds that the matter is ripe for consideration. I. BACKGROUND The record, viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs, reveals the following…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.