Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1987No. CR 86-205PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

James Smith was convicted of rape and sentenced to life imprisonment. He raises two arguments on appeal: his confession should have been excluded, and the evidence of his guilt was insufficient. Smith concedes that if the confession is found to be admissible, there is sufficient evidence. We find the confession admissible and affirm his conviction.

Smith was arrested and jailed for loitering on April 4,1986. Three days later, police officers questioned him about a rape that occurred on April 1,1986. After he was advised of his rights and stated he understood them, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Mayfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API