Legal Opinion

McNair v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2016No. B275282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.—

INTRODUCTION

In this proceeding, we hold that Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, subdivision (a)(2) 1 allows a party to exercise a second peremptory challenge only after prevailing in an appeal from a final judgment, but not following reversal of an interim decision. Early in this litigation, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) successfully challenged a jurist under section 170.6. Thereafter, we affirmed in part and reversed in part the denial of a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute. 2 The trial judge who had ruled on the anti-SLAPP…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cornette v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sunrise Fin., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. McNair v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Sunrise Financial, LLC v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API