In Re the Extradition of David
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FOREMAN, District Judge:
Now before the Court is defendant’s Motion for an Order Compelling Answers to Interrogatories. The interrogatories seem to concern the general issue of whether David was kidnapped and brought to the United States. Plaintiff has filed objections to the answering of these questions, claiming that they are irrelevant. It is the Government’s position that the kidnapping, if it did occur, did not deprive this Court of jurisdiction nor would it constitute a defense to this extradition proceeding.
David seems to contend that he was kidnapped by agents of the United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. Francisco ToscaninoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christian Jacques David v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re the Extradition of DavidDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1975
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. VreekenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984