Legal Opinion
United States v. Whitehill
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2008No. 07-1309, 07-1311, 07-1312, 07-1318PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
These appeals arise out of a telemarketing scheme to defraud would-be credit card purchasers. Zachary Whitehill, Bradley Lovstad, Monty Wanless, and Jaime Cook were charged with conspiracy to commit Wire and Telemarketing Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Aiding and Abetting Wire and Telemarketing Fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 2325, and 2. In addition, Whitehill was charged with Aiding and Abetting Money Laundering, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1957 and 2, and Criminal Forfeiture, 18 U.S.C. § 982. Following a jury trial, Whitehill, Lovstad and Wanless were convicted of conspiracy and aiding and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HilandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Martin SigillitoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AlemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Bobbie KeysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HuggansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.