Legal Opinion

People v. Hudson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2017No. A147910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

—Appellant Rayshaun Hudson stole an automobile from a dealer’s service garage by taking it without permission and driving it out the exit. One of the dealer’s employees unsuccessfully attempted to pull appellant out of the moving vehicle. Convicted of carjacking, appellant argues the trial court’s instruction to the jury on the definition of “force” impermissibly allowed the jury to find that the momentum of the car as appellant exited the showroom satisfied the statutory requirement. Because the momentum of the car was sufficient force to support the conviction, we affirm.

PRO…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roberto Solorio-Ruiz v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gutierrez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. People v. Markbreiter CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. Mendez-TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. People v. Mendez-TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API