Legal Opinion
Harris v. Maready
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided September 20, 1983No. 8221SC939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
The plaintiff Shirley Harris, being a former client, sued the law firm of Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze and Ma-ready, along with the individual defendants W. F. Maready and William H. Petree, for professional legal malpractice. From July *31976 to 18 January 1979 the law firm, principally through W. F. Maready, represented Shirley Harris in domestic matters against defendant Roger Harris, her former husband. Because William H. Petree, a partner in the law firm, and Roger Harris were involved in some independent business enterprises, a conflict of interest allegedly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. A. H. Fischer Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Wiles v. Welparnel Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Plemmons v. Southern Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Childress v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Stokes v. Wilson and Redding Law FirmCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Schell v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Harris v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983