Legal Opinion

Moore v. Duncan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1916No. 2850PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; John H. Clarke, Judge. Action by Laura Moore against William M. Duncan, as receiver of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company. Defendant confessed judgment for part of the amount claimed, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error, as assignee of the consignee of three separate shipments of pig tin from New York and Philadelphia to Steubenville, Ohio, over railroads forming connecting lines between the respective places of shipment and the place of delivery, sued the receiver of the terminal carrier on account of the loss of a portion of each shipment, charging that while the car containing the tin was “in the custody and control of the defendant and in course of transportation over the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad as a common carrier within the state of Ohio, pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glickfeld v. Howard Van Lines, Inc. Howard Van Lines, Inc. v. GlickfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Bank of California, N. A. v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. FontaineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Hand & Johnson Tug Line v. Canada S. S. Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API