Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Jones

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1929No. 6923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It has been held, by this court: “While the commencement of an action is indispensable to the rendition of a judgment, and ordinarily the filing of a writ is indispensable to the commencement of án action, yet a defendant may, in so far as it affects himself, waive the statutory period within which the writ is by law required to be filed, and thus voluntarily submit to the jurisdiction, and subject himself to a judgment; but such waiver does not bind third persons, nor confer such jurisdiction upon the court as will authorize it to render a judgment which will affect them; and a judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Grocery Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Smith v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Miller v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API