Legal Opinion

Ransom v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 4, 1907PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.

These are actions of contract brought to recover wages, which the plaintiff would have received, if employed continuously by the defendant, in the first action, from May 6,1895, to November 4,1903, and, in the second, from November 5, 1903, to July 5, 1906.

The first action was before this court in 192 Mass. 299. The plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandamus to restore him to the labor service in the employ of the defendant brought in July, 1905, was passed upon in 193 Mass. 537.

A judge of the Superior Court* found as facts that the plaintiff was a veteran of the civil war within the meaning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Hill v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Ransom v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Streeter v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Stiles v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Whitney v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Garvey v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API