Riordan v. Gas Consumers' Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is an appeal prosecuted by the plaintiff from an order granting the defendant a new trial.
The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries caused through the alleged negligent and careless manner in which a certain horse attached to a buggy was managed by the defendant through its superintendent Fagan, by reason of which the horse ran away and collided with a buggy in which plaintiff was riding, thereby inflicting upon him the injuries complained of.
Plaintiff alleges that on the eleventh day of December, 1901, the date upon which the accident happened, the defendant, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mulvehill v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Noblesville & Eagletown Gravel Road Co. v. GauseIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hiroshima v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Jessen v. Peterson, Nelson & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Stansell v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hall v. Puente Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.