PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PENNSYLVANIA v. Casey
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HUYETT, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiffs challenge the 1988 amendments to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, Act of March 25,1988, No. 31 §§ 3-10, 1988 Pa.Legis.Serv. 173 (Purdon) (“Act 31”), amending 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3201-20 (the “Act”). 1 Plaintiffs assert that Act 31 violates the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I have subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(a)(3), and 1343(a)(4), and the Fourteenth Amendment to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Planned Parenthood v. CaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey No. A-655Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- King v. Fox Grocery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PENNSYLVANIA v. CaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n of the Atlanta Area, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.