Legal Opinion

Ruch v. Wilhelm

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1945No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

Appellant, William J. Ruch, having been summarily dismissed by the Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Motor Police 1 from membership in that body, now seeks reinstatement and reimbursement on the ground that the Commissioner had no legal right to discharge him except upon presentation and conviction of charges in court-martial or similar proceedings.

Euch enlisted as a private in the Pennsylvania State Police in 1920, resigned shortly thereafter, enlisted in 1924 as a member of the State Highway Patrol, and, by successive re-enlistments, served in the Patrol…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Neil v. Am. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Chester County Institution District v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Glessner's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Dussia v. BargerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. INSURANCE FEDERATION OF PA v. Dept. of Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Zeloyle v. BettorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Alexander v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API