Legal Opinion
Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 8, 1998No. 96-1210-CV-W-3PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SMITH, District Judge.
Pending is Defendant Credit Acceptance Corporation’s (“CAC”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. # 89) and CAC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 88). Upon careful consideration by the Court, for the reasons set forth below, Defendant CAC’s motions are denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The factual background of this case has been previously set forth in detail in Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 175 F.R.D. 313 (1997). Therefore, only the facts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
- Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000
- Jurek v. Piller USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021