Legal Opinion
Candarini v. Attorney General of United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 25, 1974No. 73-C-1471 to 73-C-1473, 73-C-1493, 73-C-1510, 73-C-1573, 73-C-1582, 73-C-1618, 73-C-1632PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TRAVIA, District Judge.
These matters are separately present before the court on the petitioners’ applications for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus and certiorari. The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York has appeared in opposition to the petitioners’ requested relief. All interested respondents have been requested to appear and submit opposing papers if they so desired. Without exception, they have opted not to appear but rather have agreed that the United States Attorney for this district act as their advocate and he has submitted opposing papers on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Franklin v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Richerson v. Dennis Wolff, Warden, Sheridan Institution, and the Illinois Parole and Pardon BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Childs v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.