Legal Opinion

Manacek v. George McLachlan Hat Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 20, 1936No. File #48545Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcEVOY, J.

On September 21, 1931, a finding and award was made granting compensation to this claimant and the compensation was to commence on December 10, 1931. The claimant was then suffering from mercurial poisoning which arose out of and in the course of his employment as a hatter.

In accordance with that award compensation was duly paid by the respondent until October 22, 1932.

About the middle of October, 1932, the attending physician discharged the claimant and concluded that the claimant was able to return to work, but that claimant “still had symptoms of'mercury poisoning.”

On the next day, October…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Tippman v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API