Legal Opinion
Tippman v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff claims to recover under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for the death of her husband, Otto Tippman, an employee of the state highway department, who died of pneumonia March 2d, 1932. The commissioner denied compensation, and upon appeal to the Superior Court his conclusion was sustained and the appeal dismissed, and the case comes before us on an appeal by the plaintiff from that judgment. The question before the commissioner and the Superior Court was whether the deceased had suffered an injury which was compensable.
The finding, with such corrections as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Linnane v. Aetna Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Driscoll v. Jewell Belting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Senzamici v. Waterbury Castings Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Richardson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Galluzzo v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levecque v. DupuisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Morowski v. Malleable Iron Fittings Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Covaleski v. Russell & Erwin Division, American Hardware Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Manacek v. George McLachlan Hat Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1936
- Manacek v. George McLachlan Hat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936