Legal Opinion

Christoffel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 22, 1948No. 9788PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has been convicted of perjury as a witness before the Coipmittee. on Education and Labor of the House of Repre sentatives. The sufficiency of the evidence .that he gave false answers under oath is not disputed. Neither is the authority of the Committee, when sitting, to ask the questions. Appellant’s chief contention is that the Committee was not sitting.

The Committee had 25 members. Under the rules of the House a majority was a quorum. The Committee’s records show, and there is no dispute, that 14 members were present at the beginning of the afternoon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. Christoffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Best v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
  5. Lawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API